USAirlinePilots.org
US Airline Pilots Association

Accident/Incident Hotline
800-341-7176 or 310-854-5290

Representing the pilots of US Airways  
  HOME | NEWS & FINANCE | MEMBERS ONLY SECTION | PRESS RELEASES | DONATE | CONTACT

 

 

(enable cookies & pop-ups)

 


Media Contact

Press Releases

 

LCC Stock Chart

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

News & Finance
Financial news and commentary

 

 

Ahead of the bell: Calyon upgrades airlines
Tuesday October 28, 8:26 am ET
Calyon's Neidl upgrades rating on airline stocks, cites steep drop in oil prices


ATLANTA (AP) -- Stocks of major network carriers got an upgrade Tuesday from a Calyon Securities airline analyst, who cited dramatically falling oil prices and the deep capacity cuts implemented to support ticket prices and revenue.

Analyst Ray Neidl said in a research note that his firm raised its ratings for major network carriers to "Add" from "Neutral."

Neidl said the firm also was raising its earnings per share estimates based on new, lower oil price assumptions.

The firm remains cautious on airlines' outlook in the short-term due to the uncertain economy and volatile markets and oil prices.

The research note said the airlines have shown discipline in cutting capacity, and the firm believes that carriers have the ability and would be willing to take further actions if demand falls more sharply than currently forecast.

"We expect these actions will provide further pricing traction for the carriers," the note said. "Since new market development will be largely curtailed, this large cost item should be eliminated for the duration of the economic slowdown."

The note said as the economic downturn continues and airlines move into the slower winter season, the firm believes that if airline stocks soften further, that would make them even more attractive to purchase.

"It is difficult to predict short-term stock price movements in such a volatile market for both equities and oil prices, but we recommend investors establish and add to positions on price weakness," the note said.

In premarket trading AMR Corp., parent of American Airlines, rose 50 cents, or 5.8 percent, to $9.10. Continental Airlines gained $1.05, or 7.3 percent, at $15.49. Delta Air Lines added 33 cents, or 4.3 percent, at $7.99. Northwest Airlines rose 8 cents to $9.10. UAL Corp., parent of United Airlines, gained 70 cents, to 6.1 percent, at $12.10. US Airways added 39 cents, or 5.5 percent, at $7.54. JetBlue rose 36 cents, or 8.1 percent, at $4.82. Southwest Airlines lost 6 cents at $10.60.

 


 

Major airlines upgraded on oil prices, capacity cuts
By Christopher Hinton
Last update: 8:54 a.m. EDT Oct. 28, 2008

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Calyon Securities on Tuesday raised its rating for the major airline carriers to add from neutral, citing the dramatic drop in oil prices and deep capacity cuts. The major carriers are AMR Corp., Continental, Northwest, Delta, UAL Corp., US Airways, and Alaska Air. The research firm raised its rating despite the weakening economy since carriers have aggressively increased their cash positions, helping them weather the economic downturn without bankruptcies. It also puts them in a good position to take advantage of a "likely" spring recovery, Calyon said. However, economic pressure could further soften stock prices over the winter, the firm said.


 

UAL, Delta Fuel-Hedge Losses May Herald Profits for Airlines
By Mary Jane Credeur

Oct. 27 (Bloomberg) -- UAL Corp.'s United Airlines, Delta Air Lines Inc. and Southwest Airlines Co. all posted quarterly losses in part because of charges tied to jet-fuel contracts they bought in advance. Investors say that's good news.

The Bloomberg U.S. Airlines Index is up 8.2 percent since carriers began reporting earnings Oct. 15, while the Standard & Poor's 500 Index has fallen 3.4 percent. After tumbling fuel prices caused deficits because of airlines' hedges, Wall Street is betting that lower energy costs herald profits next year.

``Long-term value investors who have basically avoided airlines for decades are looking at taking stakes,'' said Michael Derchin, an analyst at FTN Midwest Research Securities in New York. ``The common wisdom going into a recession is that the last group to do well would be airlines. But I'm modeling profits for all of them'' in 2009.

The 10 biggest U.S. carriers lost a combined $2.52 billion in the third quarter, partly because of writedowns in the value of hedges. Jet fuel surged to a record $4.36 a gallon in July, then plunged 52 percent to $2.18 on Oct. 24.

``It's remarkable how much has changed in such a short period,'' Doug Parker, chief executive officer of US Airways Group Inc., said on a conference call on Oct. 23, when the airline posted an $865 million net loss that included writedowns for fuel hedges.

US Airways jumped 32 percent in New York trading this quarter through Oct. 24, the second-biggest advance among 14 airlines in the Bloomberg index behind UAL's 36 percent. The S&P 500 plummeted 25 percent in the same period.

`Nobody Knows'

The largest U.S. carriers announced 26,000 job cuts and the grounding of 460 jets as fuel was rising, trimming costs to help them weather any travel slowdown from the credit crunch. The drop in fuel prices further strengthens their ability to halt losses.

``Most airlines can make a profit at jet-fuel prices at these levels,'' said John Armbrust, an aviation fuel consultant in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. ``The question is, do prices stay where they are? Nobody knows.''

Without last quarter's fuel-hedge charges, Southwest, Northwest Airlines Corp. and Alaska Air Group Inc. all said they would have made money. Marking down the value of fuel hedges snapped Southwest's 17-year quarterly profit streak.

The 10 carriers had an operating loss of about $870 million, narrower than analyst Derchin's estimated $1 billion. He projects about $5 billion in profits for the group next year.

They'll probably be ``break-even, maybe better'' this quarter, he said. Through nine months, the collective operating loss was $2.86 billion, based on airlines' reports.

Carriers including Southwest, US Airways and AirTran Holdings Inc. said they may defer additional fuel-hedging contracts until oil prices stabilize.

`Free Fall'

``In the last three weeks alone, oil's down $40'' per barrel, AirTran CEO Bob Fornaro said in an Oct. 23 interview. ``The market really is in a free fall.''

Fidelity Management & Research is among the investors adding to airline holdings last quarter, boosting its stake in Continental Airlines Inc. to 15 million shares, or almost 14 percent. The world's largest mutual-fund company previously held 4.8 percent.

The risks for airline stocks include the possibility that the weakening global economy will decimate demand, as well as the prospect of another jump in fuel prices, said Kevin Crissey, an analyst at UBS Securities in New York.

Still, Crissey also projects profits for the U.S. industry next year. He cited the carriers' cuts in domestic capacity of 10 percent to 15 percent and said oil is unlikely to return to its $147-a-barrel peak.

Offering fewer flights gives airlines more pricing power. Passenger unit revenue, a measure of fares and fees, jumped by 8 percent or more for most carriers last quarter, and Delta is among the airlines saying they expect similar gains in the current period.

``The perception is that the airlines are in more trouble than they actually are,'' Crissey said in an interview. ``Investors love the capacity argument. If it was just a fuel price drop, that'd be more shaky. But together, it's a much more compelling argument.''


With fuel costs lower, airlines say they can stand less demand
10:16 PM CDT on Sunday, October 26, 2008
By TERRY MAXON

After all they've been through, airlines are saying they can withstand a little drop in demand – or a big drop, if it comes to that.

Delta president Ed Bastian says, 'A significant decrease in demand is in some ways easier to work with than $150 oil.' The reason? The big fall in energy prices means that they'll have billions of dollars more left in their pockets in the fourth quarter and next year than they had – until very recently – been expecting.

"Given the magnitude of the oil decline, it would take a truly unprecedented decline in demand to overcome the impact of oil," US Airways Group Inc. president Scott Kirby said last week.

As major U.S. carriers have taken turns talking about their dismal third-quarter losses – $2.5 billion for the 10 largest carriers – they've also expressed optimism they'll weather any economic downturn.

Speaking to analysts last Thursday, Mr. Kirby pointed out that each $1 decrease in the price of a barrel of oil translates into $35 million of savings a year for US Airways. And oil has declined by more than $80 a barrel since hitting a high over $147 in July.

Using some complicated math, Mr. Kirby said industry revenue would have to decline 22 percent to offset the savings from cheaper jet fuel and capacity cuts taken by airlines in 2008 or planned for 2009.

"And with the exception of 9/11, nothing like that has happened in the history of the airline industry," Mr. Kirby said.

Industry executives have told Wall Street that they're seeing only slight drops in passenger demand so far, although they're planning for the worst.

"Looking into 2009, we expect to experience a decline in demand given the current economic crisis and are developing plans with a number of different scenarios," Delta Air Lines Inc. president and chief financial officer Ed Bastian told analysts on an Oct. 16 conference call.

"But a significant decrease in demand is in some ways easier to work with than $150 oil was this past summer," he added.

In many ways, the airline industry has been like an area hit by a hurricane – the winds have died down, but the damage is still being cleaned up.

Through the first nine months of 2008, the 10 largest U.S. carriers reported net losses of $20 billion, compared to $6.5 billion in profits in 2007. The 2008 losses were inflated, however, as several airlines wrote down "goodwill" they had been carrying on their balance sheets.

On an operating basis excluding the goodwill write-offs, those 10 carriers lost $2.6 billion through Sept. 30, compared with an operating profit of $5.5 billion in the first nine months of 2007 – an $8.1 billion reversal.

Blame it all, and then some, on fuel. The 10 carriers have paid $12.9 billion more for fuel in 2008 than in 2007. Through Sept. 30, fuel made up nearly 35 percent of all expenses, compared to less than 27 percent a year earlier.

In the third quarter alone, those airlines spent $14 billion on fuel, up $5.8 billion from the 2007 period. Six of the 10 carriers spent more than 40 percent of their operating budgets on fuel, led by AirTran Airways Inc.'s 50.6 percent.

However, assuming that oil prices don't make another U-turn and head upward, airlines expect to get a big relative break on energy spending in coming quarters. Industry analysts are quickly rewriting their earnings estimates to reflect the improving picture.

Only a few months ago, a number of analysts were muttering aloud about the potential for bankruptcies and debating about who would crater first. The talk now is more about how much capacity the industry needs to support a down economy, not whether the airlines will run out of money this year or next.

Typical is airline analyst Jamie Baker of J.P. Morgan Chase, who said in a research note last week that cheaper fuel is a bigger deal than lower demand.

"We are exponentially more comfortable with airline credit quality across the board ... in the current rapidly weakening demand but much lower oil and significantly lower capacity environment vs. our view six months ago when oil was on its way to $150, demand trends remained uncertain, and the industry was much bigger," Mr. Baker wrote.

"In other words, we are happy to trade demand trend downside for a 50 percent cut in fuel prices, a scenario that is inherently much more easily navigated by airline management teams," he said.

 


 

Capacity cuts, fuel price fall to help US airlines: UBS
Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38pm EDT


Oct 24 (Reuters) - The combination of capacity cuts and a decline in fuel prices will help U.S. airlines weather a slack in demand, said a UBS analyst, who raised his price targets on three airlines, including US Airways Group.

However, airlines should boost liquidity through capital raises as debt levels remain too high, analyst Kevin Crissey said.

"The balance sheets of most US airlines look as if they've just come out of a recession, rather than going into one," the analyst said. "There is nothing to say fuel can't reverse course quickly and leave the airlines short on cash again."

Oil dropped more than $4 a barrel on Friday as gloom about a global economic downturn sapping fuel demand took the steam out of an OPEC agreement to cut output.

On Thursday, US Airways, AirTran Holdings, JetBlue Airways and Alaska Air Group reported quarterly losses, linking their results to a historic spike in fuel prices in the third quarter.

Crissey, who expects travel demand to likely be very weak soon, raised his price targets on US Airways, AirTran and Alaska.

Separately, Credit Suisse raised its price target on US Airways to $13 from $10.

"Fourth-quarter 2008 revenue should be ok for the industry, but our thesis is that 2009 likely proves more challenging," analyst D.McKenzie wrote in a note to clients.

Shares of US Airways jumped more than 12 percent to $8.03 in afternoon trade on the New York Stock Exchange.

 


 

US Airways Group, Inc. Secures $950 Million in Financing and Liquidity Commitments
TEMPE, Ariz.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- 
October 23, 2008

US Airways Group, Inc. (NYSE: LCC) announced today that as part of a comprehensive liquidity program launched in mid August, the Company has raised approximately $950 million of financing and near-term liquidity commitments. On October 20, 2008 the Company closed on $800 million of these transactions with $400 million of proceeds used to prepay the Company's $1.6 billion bank debt facility. In exchange for this prepayment, the unrestricted cash covenant contained in the loan agreement for the bank debt facility has been reduced from $1.25 billion to $850 million. The loan agreement's term remains the same at seven years with substantially all of the principal amount payable at maturity in March 2014. The remaining proceeds from these financing transactions, approximately $370 million after payment of certain bank and other service fees, increase the Company's total cash position and will be used for general corporate purposes. The remaining $150 million of liquidity commitments are expected to close during the fourth quarter, with cash benefits realized through 2009. 

"Today's announcement confirms that US Airways' financial footing is solid," said Chairman and CEO Doug Parker. "As a result of these financings our total cash position relative to annual revenues ranks solidly among the highest of the largest US carriers. Most notably, we were able to complete this financing in the midst of unprecedented global financial unrest, which is a testament to the confidence our investors and business partners have in the people of US Airways. We are extremely appreciative of their support, and we intend to reward their commitment to us by continuing to run a great operation and returning our airline to profitability in the years ahead." 

The Company estimates that 2009 expenses will increase by approximately $90 million due to costs related to these transactions, of which approximately $65 million is non-cash. 

Chief Financial Officer Derek Kerr added, "Combined with our August equity offering which generated $179 million, and other financings completed during the quarter, US Airways has raised or secured approximately $1.2 billion in cash and payment deferrals since we released our second quarter financial results."

 


 

US Airways beat earning estimates by $0.19, reports Revs in-line
BRIEFING.COM
October 23, 2008

LCC Reports Q3 (Sep) loss of $2.35 per share, excluding charges, $0.19 better than the First Call consensus of ($2.54); revenues rose 7.4% year/year to $3.26 bln vs. the $3.26 bln consensus. Mainline passenger revenue per available seat mile in Q3 was 11.32 cents, up 4.4% over the same period last year. The company announced separately today, it has significantly improved its liquidity position and raised approximately $950 mln of financing and near-term liquidity commitments. "Today's announcement confirms that US Airways' financial footing is solid," said Chairman and CEO Doug Parker. "As a result of these financings our total cash position relative to annual revenues ranks solidly among the highest of the largest US carriers. Most notably, we were able to complete this financing in the midst of unprecedented global financial unrest, which is a testament to the confidence our investors and business partners have in the people of US Airways... The industry is also moving to a more profitable a la carte pricing model of its product and services with US Airways at the forefront of that change. We expect these new a la carte pricing initiatives to contribute between $400-500 mln in revenue during 2009."

 


 

AIRLINE STOCKS
Airlines fire up after oil hits 14-month low
By Christopher Hinton, MarketWatch
Last update: 4:39 p.m. EDT Oct. 16, 2008

(MarketWatch) -- Oil dipped to its lowest point in more than a year on Thursday, bringing about sharp gains in shares of the so-called legacy carriers that had appeared to be sinking this summer beneath the weight of record-high fuel costs.

The Amex Airline Index surged 21% to finish at 21.64 points with all of its 14 components trading higher. The benchmark index has climbed about 71% since hitting bottom in July when the price of oil reached $147 a barrel. More recently, crude oil for November delivery fell $4.69 to finish at $69.85 a barrel in electronic trading on Globex, ending below its 2007 average price of $72 a barrel, a year when most airlines were posting profits. Early last year the airline index peaked at 66.92, but prospects for a return to such lofty highs look bleak these days as the economy weakens toward an economic recession. The crisis in the credit markets has taken its toll on airline sales, and in August, the number of passengers flying declined for the first time since 2003.

Now carriers that were cutting back on seat capacity to trim costs in the wake of record-high jet fuel prices are focused on reducing capacity to deal with an anticipated decline in passenger numbers. Again, analysts are saying those airlines with the most flexibility in their fleet management will fare best.

Leading the pack Thursday were shares of United parent company UAL Corp., up 40% to close at $10.30; US Airways added 28.2% to $6.78; Delta Air Lines rose 18.8% to end at $8.84; and American Airlines parent AMR Corp. jumped 23% to $10.80.

Also climbing was Southwest. The Dallas carrier swung to a third-quarter loss after falling oil prices penalized its fuel hedging program, but on an adjusted basis Southwest posted a profit ahead of the Wall Street consensus. Shares of Southwest rose 8% to close at $12.49.

Meanwhile, the world's No. 5 airline, Continental, swung to a third-quarter loss from a year-earlier profit. Despite 8.8% higher revenue, 62% higher fuel prices and the impact of Hurricane Ike hammered results. Continental shares rose 22.7% to finish at $15.75.


 

AP
Sector Snap: Airlines mostly up as oil drops
Wednesday October 15, 2:38 pm ET
Airline stocks trade mostly higher amid broader market sell-off as oil dips below $75 a barrel


NEW YORK (AP) -- Shares of major U.S. airlines rose in trading Wednesday amid a sharply lower broader market, as the price of oil reached its lowest point in 13 months.

Also Wednesday, American Airlines parent AMR Corp. and Delta Air Lines Inc. reported third-quarter earnings. AMR reported an operating loss that was roughly inline with Wall Street expectations, while Delta Air Lines missed analysts' forecasts.

But investors were squarely focused on oil prices. Light, sweet crude for November delivery fell $2.95 to $75.68 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange after earlier sliding to $74.57, the lowest trading level since Sept. 5 of last year.

Oil prices have now plummeted 48 percent since a July 11 record.

In afternoon trading, Delta rose 34 cents, or 5 percent, to $7.69. AMR gained 14 cents, or 2 percent, to $8.93. Northwest Airlines Corp. added 24 cents, or 3 percent, to $9.11. United parent UAL Corp. rose 25 cents, or 4 percent, to $7.38.

Among airline stocks losing steam was Southwest Airlines Co., which declined 24 cents, or 2 percent, to $12.08. The carrier is set to report earnings Thursday.


TheStreet.com
US Airways' CEO: Merger Saved Jobs
10/14/08 - 04:27 PM EDT
Ted Reed


CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- Three years after the merger between US Airways and America West, it seems clear the deal was an overall success.

Still, the inability to reach an agreement on pilot seniority stands out as a glaring shortcoming.

Without a merger, "neither the standalone US Airways nor the standalone America West could have managed through," said CEO Doug Parker, in a recent interview. "Both these airlines would be nonexistent had they not merged. But merged, we saved 35,000 jobs."

At the same time, "pilot seniority is not something we contemplated we'd still be dealing with three years later", Parker admitted.

The bitter seniority conflict follows an arbitrator's ruling that was deemed unacceptable by most pilots from the former US Airways. It has been accompanied by an April election that ousted the Air Line Pilots Association after 57 years, and a series of lawsuits.

On the positive side, "our pilots are keeping this between themselves," Parker said. "We've had no customers see this affect them in the last three years. People read about it, but it hasn't affected our operations one bit."

Meanwhile, Charlotte and Philadelphia, the two hubs operated by the former US Airways, have been the strongest links in the new carrier. They have suffered minimal capacity reduction despite cuts of about 25% in Las Vegas and 10% in Phoenix, which has come as the industry moves to reduce total capacity by an unprecedented 10% in response to higher fuel prices.

"Charlotte has proven to be more resilient than other parts of the country," Parker said, even taking into account the merger of Wachovia, Charlotte's second-largest employer, into Wells Fargo.

"US Airways' position in Charlotte is not dependent on Wachovia being as big as it is here," Parker said. "Charlotte is much bigger and stronger than that."

Philadelphia, long a trouble spot for the airline, has improved. In terms of departures within 14 minutes of the scheduled time, US Airways' Philadelphia operation showed a 25-point improvement, to 76.5%, from the first half of 2007 to the first half of 2008. "The turnaround in US Airways has been stunning within itself," Parker said. "The turnaround in Philadelphia is even more dramatic."

US Airways emerged from bankruptcy in September 2005 after a merger with America West. The new company quickly began to make money due to capacity declines throughout the industry and strong demand.

The merger's success led Parker to pursue both Delta and UAL. Those efforts failed, although some speculate that UAL, the parent of United, might become interested were US Airways to resolve its pilot seniority issues. Meanwhile, Delta plans to combine with Northwest.

For its part, the US Airline Pilots Association, which replaced ALPA at US Airways, recently marked the third anniversary of the tie-up, saying in prepared statement that "the airline is entangled in labor disputes, lawsuits and customer service issues, and management so far seems incapable of getting the merger completed."

As for merging pilot groups, said USAPA president Stephen Bradford, "What the Delta and Northwest managements did in just a couple of months, US Airways management hasn't been able to do in over three years."

Aviation consultant George Hamlin says the carrier could gain efficiencies if pilot lists and contracts are merged. But, if unresolved, the pilot conflict could encumber US Airways to the extent that it comes to resemble Eastern Airlines in its final days, Hamlin says.

"If you put parochial interests first, last and only, you could destroy your employer," he says. "But so far, you have to count this as a success, because the airline is still here."



TheStreet.com
For Airlines, Demand Matters More Than Earnings
Monday October 13, 2:30 pm ET
By Ted Reed, TheStreet.com Staff Reporter


If the world economy is going to be smaller going forward, the U.S. airline industry was ahead of the curve.
Carriers have downsized dramatically since the summer travel season ended, preparing for a world of $140-a-barrel oil. They have eliminated older aircraft and marginal routes that account for about 10% of nationwide capacity, and they have implemented fees that are expected to add hundreds of millions in annual revenue for the major carriers.

Since then, oil prices have fallen steeply, setting the stage for what many people see as a profitable 2009. The wild card is whether the financial market turmoil will impact demand, but so far industry cuts appears to have offset any impact from a potential decline in travel.

With airline earnings reports set to begin this week, observers will be closely watching for news on future booking trends.

AMR and Delta will report on Wednesday, while Continental and Southwest will report on Thursday.

At US Airways, "bookings remain solid and we're not having any trouble filling up airlines," CEO Doug Parker said in a recent interview. "But you can't help but be concerned."

UAL, the parent of United Airlines, moved to cut fall and winter capacity, a decision that was "very timely, largely driven by high oil prices but just before the financial crisis had arrived," CEO Glenn Tilton told ATW Online last week. United cut capacity by 16%.

Tilton said United has not seen any significant drop in passengers during the current quarter, although there is "some softening" in forward bookings for next year.

Without question, some airlines will pay a price for fuel-hedging bets they made when oil traded at higher prices. Last month, United said its third-quarter earnings will include $544 million in losses from fuel-hedging contracts. Alaska Air said last week that it expects a "significant" third-quarter loss due to special items including a $220 million mark-to-market loss on fuel hedges.

Still, as American CEO Gerard Arpey said in July during a third-quarter earnings call, falling oil prices "would be a high-class problem to have."

Parker, meanwhile, notes that passengers are less likely to check luggage or consume drinks when a charge is involved. For instance, in September, the number of checked bags on US Airways fell by 25%. "We've stumbled onto a better product," he says.

Many airline analysts are optimistic about 2009. In a recent report, Avondale Partners analyst Bob McAdoo writes that investors worry that demand is slowing, but he says the double-digit capacity cuts should more than cover any shortfall.

"Based on recent conversations with various airline management teams, we believe the sharp stock market selloff and current overall economic weakness are not materially slowing demand for air travel," McAdoo wrote last week. "New bookings in the past seven days are neither meaningfully different than in recent weeks nor different from booking patterns last year."

Standard and Poor's analyst Jim Corridore has doubts. He recently reiterated a hold on American, raising his 12-month target price to $8 from $6. "For '09, we think the recent sharp drop in oil prices will lead to significantly lower losses than we were earlier expecting, although we remain wary of the impact of the global financial crisis on air travel demand next year," Corridore wrote.

However, JP Morgan analyst Jamie Baker wrote in a recent report that even were demand to fall considerably, "we are having a tough time modeling losses." Baker said airline shares are trading far below their value, saying: "Nothing we've experienced comes close to explaining a recent $5 share price for United, considering we expect it to earn something similar (untaxed) in 2009." JP Morgan has a financial relationship with United that includes acting as a market maker.


 


 

AP
Barclays says airlines earnings set to improve
Thursday October 2, 1:17 pm ET
Barclays analyst sees smaller losses or profits for airlines as capacity and fuel costs fall



MINNEAPOLIS (AP) -- The outlook for airlines is improving, with lower fuel prices and fewer seats setting carriers up for a better 2009, Barclays Capital analyst Gary Chase wrote on Thursday.

Chase forecast much smaller losses for 2008 and 2009 across the sector versus his previous expectation, and he predicted profits for Continental Airlines Inc. and Alaska Air Group this fiscal year, instead of losses.

Spooked by fuel prices which spiked over the summer, airlines have been cutting the number of flights, hoping to raise prices. They are still doing that, even though fuel prices have retreated.

"The new lease on life afforded the industry by a dramatic reduction in jet fuel prices should give investors the time to benefit from this phenomenon," Chase wrote. He said his top picks are United Airlines parent UAL Corp., as well as Delta Air Lines Inc. and Northwest Airlines Corp. (which are hoping to combine by the end of this year), "but we believe the whole sector looks very compelling right now."

He left his ratings on the stocks unchanged. But for Continental, he now predicts 2008 profit of 25 cents per share, versus a previous call for a loss of $2.04 per share, and 2009 profit of $1.50 per share instead of a loss of $3.70.

The analyst still expects AirTran Holdings Inc. to lose money this year, but he now expects a 2009 profit of 25 cents per share instead of a loss of 85 cents.

Chase wrote that the results are being driven by the reductions in flying capacity by the airlines. He wrote that he expects domestic capacity to fall almost 12 percent in the fourth quarter of 2008.

"We continue to believe the industry will remain disciplined on capacity and will execute on announced capacity reductions," he wrote.

In Thursday afternoon trading, shares of most airlines fell with the broader market. AMR Corp. lost 20 cents at $10.96. Continental fell 10 cents to $17.50. Southwest gave up 27 cents at $13.93. JetBlue dropped 23 cents, or 4.6 percent, to $4.82. Delta lost 56 cents, or 6.6 percent, at $7.99, and Northwest fell 84 cents, or 8 percent, to $9.66.

A couple of carriers posted slim gains. UAL added 11 cents at $9.63, and US Airways rose 10 cents to $7.10.


Union: Lingering talks in airlines' merger causing confusion, morale problems
Oct 02, 2008
Beaver County Times - McClatchy-Tribune Information Services

Three years after the merger of US Airways and the former America West Airlines in September 2005, the combined carrier's two largest labor groups still remain without joint contracts. One of the labor groups believes that has taken its toll on the carrier's performance.

"Our situation causes confusion, inefficiencies and severe morale problems that carry over into the airline's operation," said Stephen Bradford, president of the US Airline Pilots Association, which represents US Airways' 5,300 pilots.

"We see these inefficiencies day after day, and at times, they create passenger delays and prevent the company from achieving its potential," Bradford said.

USAPA spokesman James Ray pointed to federal statistics that show US Airways ranked second-to-last (worst) in customer complaints during the first half of the year among the nation's 19 largest carriers.

That has been at least in part because of the fact that pilots from the former US Airways, or East unit, make $17 an hour less than those from the former America West, or West unit, Ray said.

"We do the same job as they do, but we don't get the same pay. I don't care what line of work you're in, whether you're flipping burgers or flying an airplane, it's human nature. It affects your performance. It's demoralizing," Ray said.

US Airways spokesman Morgan Durrant said contract negotiations with the carrier's pilots and flight attendants continue. Pilot talks were stalled for months while the group wrangled over a combined seniority list and then ultimately voted to scrap its former union, the Air Line Pilots Association, in favor of USAPA this spring. Lingering resentment and lawsuits between the East and West pilots remain unresolved.

Still, Durrant disagreed that the lack of joint contracts has adversely affected the carrier's performance, citing improvements in on-time performance and baggage handling. Federal statistics show US Airways has ranked in the top 10 in on-time performance for the last nine months reported and in the top 10 in baggage handling for the last five months.

"We have made dramatic improvements. I think the (high rate of) customer complaints are driven by a perception that is lagging reality," Durrant said.

 


US Airways Pilots Mark Three Years Of Failure To Complete Merger
Wed, 01 Oct '08
The Aero-News Network


Joining With America West Announced September 27, 2005. September 27 marked three full years in which US Airways management has failed to complete their merger between the old US Air, and America West. Today, the airline is entangled in labor disputes... lawsuits... customer service issues... and public perception as a nickel-and-dime outfit, willing to sell its soul for a $15 service fee.

Adding its chorus to the chaos is the US Airline Pilots Association... formed earlier this year when US Airways pilots (that is, pilots from the old US Air operation) voted to remove the Air Line Pilots Association as their collective bargaining agent, saying ALPA had done little to represent their interests in early joint contract talks.

As ANN reported, a federal arbitrator presented a seniority formula in June 2007 that based pilot ratings on aircraft type, with pilots ranked by seniority within each group based on their time at their respective airline, and how many aircraft of that type are within the combined US Airways fleet. Under the proposal, the top 517 pilots came from US Airways... but the trouble began when talking about first officer rankings, which US Air pilots said favored their younger counterparts coming from America West.

As a result, today US Airways pilots still work under different Collective Bargaining Agreements left over from their former airlines... each having a different set of work rules and pay rates. They are not permitted to fly each other’s aircraft, or intermix crews.

While neither side is willing to budge from its stance (and, indeed, USAPA faces discord within itself, from former America West pilots) USAPA President Stephen Bradford says management is to blame for the current crisis.

"What the Delta and Northwest managements did in just a couple of months, US Airways Management hasn’t been able to do in over three years," Bradford states. "Management’s inability to complete the merger of US Airways and America West, coupled with their apparent focus on short term, quick-return management philosophies, is costing our Company in a big way."

According to USAPA figures, for the first six months of 2008 US Airways ranks a dismal 18th out of 19 on the Department of Transportation's consumer complaint list... a "sobering change" from the airline’s top rankings in years prior to the merger.

"Our situation causes confusion, inefficiencies and severe morale problems that carry over into the airline’s operation. No wonder we have to charge our passengers for water," said Bradford. "We see these inefficiencies day after day and at times they create passenger delays and prevent the Company from achieving its potential."

USAPA states merging US Airways and America West into a single airline, with a single Pilot Collective Bargaining Agreement, would allow management to capture synergies that would benefit US Airways’ passengers, investors and employees alike and go a long way towards positioning the airline for a secure future.


Airlines rattle former GOP allies
By CHRIS FRATES | 10/1/08 5:06 AM EDT
Politico.com




The airline industry hit some unexpected turbulence last summer when its push of a Democratic-backed proposal to rein in oil speculators so infuriated some Republicans that they threatened to slap their longtime allies with unwanted regulations.

One of those saber-rattling Republicans was Rep. John B. Shadegg, a longtime airline advocate whose Phoenix-based district includes the US Airways headquarters.

“I said, ‘Wait a minute. I’m not just your errand boy here, where you come in and say you want something, [and] I do it because it’s you,’” Shadegg said. “‘You guys have a history of coming in and saying small [government], low tax, less regulation, and therefore we have an agreed agenda.’”

Shadegg was outraged by what he saw as the industry’s hypocrisy, saying he made the flippant threat to illustrate how inconsistent it was that airlines, which for years had asked him to fight regulation, were now asking him to support more controls on another industry.

Airlines are just the latest industry to get snagged in Capitol Hill’s bitterly partisan election-year battles. Some of Washington’s most influential business groups are struggling with how to navigate a Democratic-controlled Congress without alienating their longtime Republican boosters — and the drive for a $700 billion financial rescue package is just the latest example.

Winning over Democrats has not come easily for business lobbyists, particularly after years of being viewed as the Republicans’ best buddies. In this Congress, business has carried the flag on Republican issues that don’t affect its industries, said a chief of staff for a House Democrat.

His advice: “Don’t be carrying the Republicans’ water on crap. The CEO of Pfizer or Abbott or whatever should not give a sh-- about the marginal tax rate, and the estate tax ought not matter to them. When you’re doing that, you’re representing a party — and the minority party to boot — and you’re not representing your interest.”

Business Roundtable President John Castellani explained it this way: “Overall, it’s a very challenging climate because the politics of the election season have really overwhelmed the ability to get the kinds of things done that we need to be competitive.”

The airlines, working to control escalating fuel prices, tried to minimize partisan fallout by crafting a plan to regulate oil speculators and increase domestic supply. With Democrats behind reining in oil speculators and Republicans favoring more oil drilling, airlines thought they had straddled the aisle.

They were wrong.

Some Republicans and business insiders saw the airlines making a deal of convenience. The move, they said, helped airlines on two levels: It gave them a boogeyman to explain away rising ticket prices and, they hoped, earn a political chit that they could cash in with Democrats the next time they had union problems.

Shadegg and some of his fellow Republicans were flabbergasted that their longtime allies had the temerity to expect their support for a position they had no hand in crafting.

Not to mention that some Republicans felt that the lobbying campaign the airlines unleashed — complete with e-mails to frequent fliers, on-hold messages on reservation lines and even in-flight magazine columns penned by chief executives — dealt almost exclusively with oil speculation and said little about increased drilling.

“What really caught a lot of Republicans off guard was not necessarily that the airlines would take the position that they took on speculation, but the aggressiveness and grass roots that they put behind it,” said a House Republican leadership aide.

“We never saw near the effort put into an initiative that they put into speculation.”

How the campaign was handled, the aide said, is “fairly well-burnt into people’s memories. They’re not likely to be forgotten.”

The airlines decided in June at an Air Transport Association board meeting to push Congress to rein in oil speculators and increase domestic supply, a solution the group thought took a bipartisan tack, said ATA President Jim May. The proposal was not drawn up to curry favor with the Democrats on labor issues but as an answer to a looming business problem.

“Since no one else was pushing the impact of speculation, that became the focus of our activity on the Hill,” May said. “We got into it for a simple reason: We were going to go bankrupt from $147-a-barrel oil.”

As the summer wore on and gas prices continued to climb, “it became abundantly clear that ‘Drill, baby, drill’ was going to become the mantra of House Republicans,” May said. “It became clear that we had a far more partisan atmosphere.”

Speculating is when investors buy or sell oil for a fixed price over a certain time period, betting that the price they negotiate will be a better deal than what they can get in the future.

Airlines believe that massive cash infusions from speculation accelerate the oil market’s volatility. The financial services industry, whose firms make many of the trades, argues that the airlines have made oil speculators straw men.

“Gas prices are set by the law of supply and demand,” said Scott Talbott, senior vice president of government affairs at the Financial Services Roundtable. “Congress should focus on a comprehensive, fact-based energy plan that focuses on increasing supply and decreasing demand.”

“Speculators have no more effect on the price of oil any more than the weather man has control over the weather,” he added.

Still, the airlines’ position hasn’t won them much love from some of their usual business allies. A financial services lobbyist called the industry’s campaign “reckless.”

“The airlines needlessly picked fights within the business community and with a political party,” the lobbyist said.

The business community, the House Democratic chief of staff said, would be well-served to take a page out of the pharmaceutical industry’s revamped playbook. The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America championed the Democratic charge last year for increased health care coverage for children.

“If PhRMA can make that kind of move, then a lot of other sectors and industries that had a less bad reputation, they have less distance to cover,” he said.

And Democrats aren’t alone in believing that the business community’s veneer of nonpartisanship is nothing but a fancy paint job.

The business community, said one of its lobbyists, is “bitching because they’ve been partisan themselves for years, and now that things look like they are changing, they’re trying to figure out what to do next.”


 


Airlines' New Fees May Mean 2009 Profits
09/25/08 - 10:48 AM EDT
Ted Reed


CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- People may complain about airlines charging fees for bags and other extras, but they are paying them anyway, to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

Combined with unprecedented capacity cuts, the new charges could help to turn the industry profitable in 2009. UAL for instance, says new fees will likely boost next year's revenue by $750 million. US Airways expects a revenue gain of $400 million to $500 million.

"These fees do seem to work," Brad Tilden, CFO of Alaska said at a Calyon-sponsored investor conference last week.

"A lot of times you see a $50 fare increase, then you look back at the end of the quarter and the average ticket price didn't go up at all," Tilden said. By contrast, he said, projected revenue from the fees actually materialize.

US Airways President Scott Kirby said fees result not only in new revenue, but also in operational benefits. "We've seen huge improvement in baggage numbers from having 10% fewer bags go through the system," he said.

Baggage handling has historically been a challenge for airlines, which are expected to transfer thousands of bags between aircraft in narrow time windows at hub airports. Not only is it time consuming, but "it's where we fail the most," Kirby said. Those failures are costly, leading to re-accommodations, deliveries beyond the airport and lost bag claims.

So far, US Airways is the only carrier to charge for drinks -- $2 for soda, juice and bottled water and $1 for coffee. As a result of the charges, which began Aug. 1, "the cabin environment is much calmer and more efficient," Kirby said.

In the past, because drinks were free, nearly every passenger had one. Now, carts no longer clog the aisles. Restroom lines have diminished. Less trash is left onboard. And it's no longer necessary to cater the aircraft every time it's on the ground.

Furthermore, "we've seen no market share impact," Kirby said. "We've looked at this closely."

AMR's American Airlines unit, which introduced the concept of a first-bag charge in May, has now been vindicated by widespread adoption of bag fees.

Three weeks later, UAL's United followed American, but the delay had allowed time for speculation that the charge might have to be rescinded if no one else implemented fees. "Four of our major competitors have now matched that fee, which I believe validates that decision," said AMR Treasurer Beverly Goulet.

Still, neither Southwest nor Delta has matched the move. Southwest, which carries the most passengers of any airline, touts its lack of fees in its advertising.

Delta, meanwhile, is poised to become the world's biggest carrier by revenue passenger miles pending approval of its planned merger with Northwest. (A report Thursday said shareholders of Delta and Northwest are likely to vote in favor of the deal.)

"While we're always keeping an eye on what's happening in the market, Delta customers can still check a first bag for free," said Delta spokeswoman Betsy Talton.


 

Ahead of the Bell: UBS upgrades airline sector
Monday September 15, 8:59 am ET

UBS analyst upgrades rebounding airline sector, saying stocks have more room to rise

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) -- UBS airline analyst Kevin Crissey sees smoother air ahead for airlines, and he upgraded several carriers Monday morning.

Crissey acknowledged that air travel demand will continue to be weak, but said airline shares could gain value anyway. They've already rebounded as oil prices have fallen, but Crissey thinks they could rise further as companies top conservative Wall Street earnings estimates.

"The impact of the lower fuel prices is significant and results in much better (earnings per share) than our prior estimates," he wrote in a note to clients.

He also said October has proved to be the best month for airline shares in the past.

The upgrades to "Buy" from "Neutral" included AirTran Holdings Inc., American Airlines parent AMR Corp., Continental Airlines Inc., Delta Air Lines Inc., Northwest Airlines Corp., United Airlines parent UAL Corp., and US Airways Group Inc. He also bumped JetBlue Airways Corp. to "Neutral" from "Sell."

Southwest Airlines Co. and Alaska Air Group Inc. retained "Neutral" ratings.

Oil prices continued to fall on Monday, dipping below $97 a barrel after U.S. oil operations sustained minimal damage from Hurricane Ike. Fuel has become the biggest expense at most airlines so their share prices had fallen as oil prices rose.

 


 

Shares of US Airways rise on upgrade
Friday September 12, 7:04 pm ET

US Airways rises on upgrade to 'Outperform'; analyst sees boost from competitors' cutbacks


NEW YORK (AP) -- A Credit Suisse analyst upgraded shares of U.S. Airways Group Inc. to "Outperform" from "Neutral" on Friday, suggesting a rival's flight cutbacks on competitive routes should help the carrier.

Shares rose 36 cents, or 4.8 percent, to end at $7.88. Oil prices, which rose 31 cents to settle at $101.18 a barrel, after briefly below $100 for the first time in five months, also helped shares of major airlines. The Amex Airline Index rose 1.7 percent to 25.21.

Analyst Daniel McKenzie predicts capacity reductions by Southwest Airlines Co. should help US Airways boost revenue by expanding in some key markets. He raised his earnings forecast for the company and said that analysts' consensus expectations are "too pessimistic."

Also, the analyst noted that previous concerns on the Tempe, Ariz., company's long-term liquidity have lessened. He said that while demand might fall a bit in the coming months, it likely won't be as severe a drop as analysts expect.

 


 

Credit Suisse raises US airlines sector
Fri Sep 12, 2008 11:23am EDT

Sept 12 (Reuters) - Credit Suisse upgraded the U.S. airlines sector to "market weight" from "underweight," saying there is good opportunity in the sector as the stocks have already priced in a weak revenue outlook and higher crude prices.

"If investors do the math on the weak economic backdrop, demand looking ahead, and the collapse in crude prices, the equation yields profit," said the brokerage, which raised its rating on U.S. Airways Group Inc.

Though there is a "modest" fall in demand, there is no sign of a collapse as in the previous downturns, it added.

"Demand overall is poised to remain intact for the next several months which means revenue should prove better than most expect," Credit Suisse said.

Credit Suisse upgraded U.S. Airways Group to "outperform" from "neutral," and said "previous concerns over LCC's longer-term liquidity outlook dissipate."

 


 

Airlines get a small boost on falling oil prices
4:50 p.m. EDT Sept. 5, 2008

Weaker U.S. economic data temper investor enthusiasm
By Christopher Hinton, MarketWatch

Despite a weaker economy, airline industry revenue per available seat mile, or RASM, is expected to surge starting in late September, said J.P. Morgan analyst Jamie Baker in a Friday note to investors.

"With fuel prices at manageable levels, demand trends are expected to retake center stage. Starting in September, we expect system mainline RASM to exceed 10%, remaining there until well into 2009," Baker said.

"While airline shares tend to seasonally find traction starting in November or December, we suggest positions instead be established before the release of September demand data," Baker said.

Airlines have been raising prices on airfare and adding new fees. On Friday, Continental (CAL:Continental Airlines Inc said it would start charging $15 for the first checked bag for certain customers who buy economy-class tickets.

The fee will go into effect Oct. 7 but won't apply to EliteAccess customers, OnePass Elite and SkyTeam Elite members, customers traveling on full-fare economy class tickets, or military personnel and their families traveling on official orders, the airline said.

Late Thursday, Northwest Airlines said its total August traffic rose 1.9% to 7.27 billion revenue passenger miles from a year ago. A revenue passenger mile equals one passenger flown one mile.

However, Delta reported its August traffic fell 0.5% to 11.84 billion revenue passenger miles from 11.91 billion last year.

 


 

Sector Snap: Airline shares higher
Friday September 5, 1:57 pm ET


ATLANTA (AP) -- Airline shares were mostly higher Friday afternoon as oil prices continued to fall.
Light, sweet crude for October delivery fell $1.66 to $106.24 a barrel in afternoon trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. It dropped as low as $105.13 during the session, its lowest trading level since early April.

The Amex Airline Index rose nearly 2 percent, with 13 of 14 component stocks higher.

JP Morgan analyst Jamie Baker said in a research note Thursday that with fuel prices at manageable levels, demand trends are expected to be a key issue as airlines try to return to profitability.

Baker pointed out the jet fuel prices are now around $3.20 a barrel, down from $4.20 a barrel when oil hit $147 a barrel earlier this summer. While that amounts to annualized cost savings of $13 billion for the industry, Baker said collective fuel costs are still about $13 billion above 2007 levels.

Shares of AMR Corp., parent of American Airlines, rose 31 cents, or 2.8 percent, to $11.09, while shares of UAL Corp., parent of United Airlines, gained 52 cents, or 4.4 percent, to $12.44. Shares of Delta Air Lines Inc. added 25 cents, or 2.8 percent, at $9.21, while shares of Northwest Airlines Corp. rose 15 cents to $11.11.

Continental Airlines Inc. shares gained 7 cents at $18.02. The carrier said it will join other airlines in charging $15 for the first piece of checked luggage.

Shares of US Airways Group Inc. rose 25 cents, or 3.3 percent, to $7.90.

Among low-cost carriers, shares of Southwest Airlines Co. rose 3 cents to $15.64, while shares of AirTran Holdings Inc., parent of AirTran Airways, rose 8 cents, or 2.9 percent, to $2.86. Shares of JetBlue Airways Corp. fell 5 cents to $6.13.



Airport traffic soars again

Thursday, August 28, 2008

(Dayton Business Journal) -The Dayton International Airport saw a 4.8 percent increase in passengers for the month of July, from the same time last year.

Year-to-date passenger traffic at the airport is up 3.5 percent.

July’s increase continues consecutive passenger growth, dating back to February 2006.

AirTran Airways was the busiest carrier with 31,845 enplanements, a 18.5 percent increase fro July 2007. US Airways followed with 22,697 enplanements, a 12 percent increase from last July. Delta Airlines dropped 0.5 percent to finish at 22,385.

Of the top 100 airports in country, Dayton International Airport ranks almost in the middle of the pack in ticket prices.

That Dayton airport slid in at No. 43 this year, with an average fare of $337 per passenger in the first quarter, according to U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics.

That’s a 2.9 percent drop from 2001, when the average was $347. But it is a 3 percent hike from the first quarter in 2007, when the average was $327.
 


 

US Airways announces plans to start service from Philadelphia to Tel Aviv in 2009

NEW YORK (Associated Press) - US Airways announced Tuesday plans to operate nonstop service between its Philadelphia hub and Tel Aviv, Israel, as the carrier moves to expand its international service.

The service, which is set to begin in July 2009 with the first tickets sold early next month, is in response to strong demand, said Michelle Mohr, a spokeswoman for US Airways.

"What's being cut is unprofitable flying in light of ultra high fuel costs," she said. "With Philadelphia-to-Tel Aviv we've known the demand is there. We've talked about adding this for quite some time."

The service is subject to approval by the U.S. Department of Transportation and Israeli government.

Shares of US Airways fell $1.35, or 15 percent, to $7.64 Tuesday.


Airlines emerge from profit-killing oil slick

 

In early July, U.S. airline stocks were so battered you could buy one share each of five big airlines for less than the cost of checking a single bag.

With oil prices then approaching $150 a barrel and air travel demand sinking, Wall Street's view was that most of the USA's airlines were destined for bankruptcy reorganization — some for liquidation — when their cash ran out within 18 months. One or two, the thinking went, would be toast by spring.

Now the summer season's end is approaching with an eight-day Labor Day travel period for which the airlines' trade association forecasts a sobering 6% drop in demand from a year ago. Yet conventional wisdom about airlines' survivability is changing rapidly, thanks in large measure to a $30-plus drop in the price of a barrel of oil.

Don't get too excited yet — airlines' financial health is notoriously volatile. But a combination of factors could help most, maybe even all, of the USA's big airlines dodge the bankruptcy filings and liquidations so widely predicted only a few weeks ago.

Over the last five months airlines have laid in deep capacity cuts, boosted fare prices by unprecedented amounts, and begun generating lots of new revenue by charging fees for services that used to be included with the ticket price. They've also refinanced debt, sold assets, and issued new stock to build up extra cash in hopes of surviving long enough for one or more of their competitors to fail — an event that presumably would greatly improve the surviving carriers' health overnight. Airlines, however, may not have to wait for one of their number to fail in order to get healthy financially.

Oil prices, which triggered the crisis in the first place, have fallen even faster over the last five weeks than they rose during the first half of this year. Since peaking above $147 a barrel on July 11, oil has fallen to $115. That's the fastest, most dramatic decline in history.

And though most carriers still can't turn a profit at existing jet fuel prices, they're getting close to the break-even point.

Another $10 to $15 drop in the price per barrel, which some oil experts now say is possible, will have most of them back in the black. Analysts at both Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan Chase even are suggesting that the haggard industry could be profitable in 2009.

As a result, investors are jumping back into airline stocks. The AMEX Airline index has almost doubled, to 23.67, after bottoming out at 12.66 on July 15. Shares of UAL, United's parent, have risen nearly 350% in five weeks, while shares of Continenta and AMR, American's parent, have gone up about 150%.

Morgan Stanley's William Greene calls the drop in oil prices a "game-changing event" and says investors now are beginning to focus on airlines' improved liquidity and their surprising access to the capital markets.

Oil price retreat is a relief

JPMorgan analysts Jamie Baker and Mark Streeter told investors in an Aug. 12 report that the "industry today is a significantly different one than that which gave us pause last March."

It's not just because jet fuel prices have fallen by more than $1 a gallon from their early summer peak, though that change by itself will save the industry more than $13 billion annually. The carriers' recent capacity cuts, decisions to ground old, fuel-inefficient planes and to boost revenue via higher fares, and the imposition of new and larger fees are likely to be long-lasting changes, Baker and Streeter wrote.

That means that instead of focusing on "the potential magnitude of the fuel-induced cash burn, capital and liquidity options, and who might disappear, and when," as Baker and Streeter did during the first half of this year, they now are "assessing who might first return to annual profitability, and when."

The JPMorgan duo now project that the USA's seven so-called legacy carriers — conventional network carriers whose histories extend decades back into the era when airlines were deregulated in 1978 — will end 2009 with about $20.3 billion in liquidity. Previously they had expected American, United, Del, Continental, Northwest, US Airway and Alaska to end 2009 with a total of just $12.4 billion in cash and short-term investments.

Worries about Frontier

Still on the critical list: Denver-based Frontier, the USA's 11th-largest airline.

That struggling low-cost carrier entered Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April to avoid having the credit card processing company that handles its credit transactions soak up the majority of its dwindling cash pile as protection against the carrier's possible collapse.

To stay aloft, Frontier this month received the first $30 million of what could become a $75 million loan from several of its largest shareholders. It will get that extra $45 million only if management can win contract concessions from workers who already are at or near the bottom in industry pay. Further complicating the survival picture, Frontier is caught in a squeeze at its home base. Denver is both a United hub and a major growth market for mighty Southwest, the juggernaut discounter that hasn't reported a quarterly loss since 1991.

Still, with the exception of Frontier and perhaps one or two other very small or undercapitalized carriers, the talk of airline liquidations in the near future was "overblown" even before oil prices pitched downward last month, says Roger King, a veteran airline debt analyst at CreditSights. Yes, he says, airlines face some monumental financial issues, including oil prices that remain higher than they ever were before this year.

"But people need to realize that these big airlines have big resources," King says. "They have horrible income statements and balance sheets. But they have what I call inertia."

Mining rich revenue streams

Millions of travelers remain steadfastly loyal to their airlines, King says, don't seem to be fazed much by rapidly rising fares, and will continue flying almost no matter what. That means airlines will continue to have large, predictable streams of revenue that will be highly valued by lenders and creditors, even when revenue doesn't cover operating costs. Those lenders and creditors would rather keep airlines flying and generating cash than repossess collateralized assets such as airplanes that would be idled for months, or even permanently, by a repossession.

"Airlines also can pull all these hidden assets out of every little nook and cranny and sell them to keep going," King says.

He points to the experience of Pan American World Airways, which lost money for more than 20 years before finally shutting down in 1991. Pan Am managed to stay in business all those years by slowly selling or refinancing all sorts of assets and subsidiaries, including its aircraft, many of its international routes, its landmark headquarters building in Manhattan, its inventory of spare parts, and even a subsidiary that did the turnaround processing on the Space Shuttle under contract to NASA.

"Small carriers may not be able to do that, but these really big airlines have tremendous underestimated staying ability," King says. "People talk about bankruptcy and liquidation, but they don't understand how deep these big airlines' resources really are."

That's not to say that U.S. airlines suddenly have become pictures of financial health. They have not.

The highest-scoring U.S. carrier among 32 conventional network airlines from around the globe recently ranked by Aviation Week & Space Technology magazine in regards to its financial health was, somewhat surprisingly, Alaska Airlines. Aviation Week's team of aviation financial consultants and analysts considered carriers' liquidity, fuel costs, earnings performance, asset utilization, operating profile and overall financial health. The latter included debt-to-equity ratios, cash balances, access to capital, operating margins and cash flow. Alaska's score was 56. Top-rated Singapore Airlines scored 93.

Southwest, the only U.S. carrier with an "A" credit rating, ranked fifth among 28 discount carriers from around the world, and second among all U.S. carriers, behind Alaska. But as highly regarded as Southwest is in the USA for its consistent profits, its score of 54 was only a little better than average and good enough only for the 20thposition among the total of 60 carriers ranked by Aviation Week.

"The health of the industry remains in question," says Calyon airline analyst Ray Neidl, a member of Aviation Week's team of advisers.

Lower cash reserves

Lower fuel prices and the carriers' recent dramatic operational and financial maneuverings have helped ease the crisis, but it has not entirely passed.

Delta and US Airways are moving close to what Neidl calls the bankruptcy/liquidation danger zone based on their cash and short-term investments at the end of June as a percentage of their revenue over the previous 12 months. The danger zone, he says, is a ratio of 10% or less. Delta's cash-to-revenue ratio on June 30 was 16.1%, while U.S. Airways' was 17.4%. Both are addressing that issue.

Balance sheets expected to improve

Delta, where operating costs and performance have improved significantly as a result of its bankruptcy reorganization, should see its ratio rise above 20% upon completion of its pending merger with Northwest, which has a cash-to-revenue ratio of 24.5%. US Airways last week issued $179 million of new shares to shore up its balance sheet.

United, though, remains the closest to Neidl's danger zone, with a 14.1% ratio of cash to revenue. That ratio will rise a few points after United picked up $600 million in cash in July by renegotiating its affinity credit card deal with Chase Bank. Neidl's also concerned that United's projected cash burn for the coming winter will be larger than at most other airlines.

Yet the outlook is not as bad as it was just over a month ago when oil was $147 a barrel and jet fuel was over $4 a gallon on the spot market.

Amazingly, after all they've been through, "airlines still have the ability to raise cash" by issuing stock, negotiating new lines of credit and selling assets, he says.

And they appear able to generate still more revenue.

"All 10 of the large, publicly traded U.S. carriers should be able to make it through this year without defaults (on their loan agreements and covenants), even in a weak economic environment with high fuel costs," he says.


US Airways conducts soda-cost comparison

US Airways, which has taken plenty of flak for charging $2 for a can of soda, did a little cola comparison shopping to help put things in perspective.

The Tempe airline priced the per-ounce price of soda at 10 other service businesses and found its charge smack in the middle at 17 cents per ounce.

At the high end, according to the results published in its employee newsletter, was Irish carrier Aer Lingus, at 68 cents per ounce, or $7.48 per serving.

Next up was the Ritz-Carlton at 50 cents per ounce, followed by Scandinavian Airlines at 41 cents.

The least expensive in its informal fizz survey: Wal-Mart at 2 cents, followed by Subway and Circle K, each at 8 cents per ounce.

Sky Harbor International Airport came in at 13 cents an ounce.

Left out was the steal US Airways employees get at the company store in Tempe: 50 cents a can, or 4.2 cents per ounce


US Airways to sell 19M shares to Merrill Lynch

US Airways to sell 19M shares in public offering to Merrill Lynch, valued at $173.1M

August 14

TEMPE, Ariz. (AP) -- US Airways Group Inc. said Thursday investment bank Merrill Lynch & Co. will buy 19 million shares of its common stock in a public offering.

At Wednesday's closing price of $9.11, that implies US Airways would net $173.1 million from the sale.

US Airways said it plans to use the proceeds for general corporate purposes. The company said it asked the New York Stock Exchange to halt trading of its shares to allow distribution of the new shares, and will issue a statement when trading resumes.

As of July 16, US Airways had approximately 92.2 million shares of common stock outstanding, according to a filing last month with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shares of US Airways gained 35 cents, or 3.8 percent, to $9.46 before trading was halted.


US Airways ranks first for on-time performance in first half, second in June

The Business Journal of the Greater Triad Area

August 5

US Airways Group Inc. says the U.S. Department of Transportation has ranked it the top carrier in on-time performance among the 10 largest airlines during the first half of 2008.

For the first six months of the year, 79.4 percent of US Airways' flights arrived within 14 minutes of their arrival time. During the month of June, US Airways ranked second with 76.3 percent of flights meeting the on-time criteria.

"Our first-place ranking amongst the largest airlines for on-time performance for the first half of 2008 validates the remarkable turnaround our airline has achieved over the past year," said Scott Kirby, president of US Airways. "Our customers tell us that getting to their destination on time is very important, and our 35,000 employees are doing their part to make sure that happens."

US Airways pays $50 to employees in months when its on-time performance makes the top three among the 10 largest U.S. airlines. June marks the seventh consecutive month for the bonus with a total of $12 million awarded since December.

Overall, U.S. airline performance showed an improvement this June compared with the same month a year ago, but timeliness slipped compared with May, the U.S. Department of Transportation reported.

Tempe-based US Airways operates 3,500 flights per day to more than 230 destinations in the United States, Canada, Europe, the Caribbean and Latin America.


US Airways cleans up bag-handling mess

Customer complaints and baggage-claim wait times have been drastically reduced.

Aug. 3, 2008
 
Two years ago, getting a checked bag from a US Airways flight in Philadelphia was a nightmare.

Passengers routinely waited an hour or more at baggage claim. Last summer, lines of international passengers from Europe and the Caribbean with bags to be rechecked to connecting flights snaked back into the U.S. Customs area, causing gridlock, missed flights and flared tempers.

Today, US Airways is solidly on its way to fixing the mess.

The 45- to 60-minute wait at baggage claim at Philadelphia International Airport has been cut to 25 minutes or less from the time a plane hits the gate.

After years of complaints about delayed, lost or damaged bags, the airline cut in half its mishandled-bag reports in Philadelphia for the three months ended June 30 - 19 bags per 1,000 passengers, compared with 39 a year earlier, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation. Nationwide, its baggage handling improved to above average from below average.

Passengers picking up luggage last week said the bags arrived on carousels much faster than they used to.

"This was the quickest I've seen it," said Carmen Ferullo of Philadelphia, arriving on a 7:10 p.m. flight from Buffalo. "It took me six minutes to walk here. The bag was on the belt. Most of the time it's a 15- to 20-minute delay from when the plane lands."

Jeff Gordon and his wife, Cindy, of Southampton, Bucks County, flew home from Los Angeles and waited 10 minutes. "This was definitely much improved," said Gordon, who flies 25,000 miles a year on US Airways. "In the past I've waited two hours, or they lost my luggage coming back just from a simple flight from Boston. This is a very favorable experience. I've seen improvement."

City Director of Aviation Charles J. Isdell said he didn't get angry letters or e-mails about baggage anymore. "That used to be a pretty regular part of my life."

The Inquirer in October 2006 detailed US Airways' chronic baggage problems in an article showing that demoralized workers, decrepit equipment, and revolving-door management had crippled the baggage-handling system.

It was no small concern for either US Airways or the region. The airline carries two-thirds of passengers at the airport, which is one of the airline's largest hubs.

After the report, US Airways spent more than $20 million on everything from new baggage equipment to more airport service workers and managers.

And it began to attack the other part of the mishandled-baggage problem: chronic delays in flight departures and arrivals. When flights don't leave or arrive on time, luggage often gets lost or waylaid between planes.

In September, the airline brought in a new chief operating officer, Robert Isom, a Northwest Airlines veteran and most recently chief restructuring officer at GMAC L.L.C., to turn around the worst on-time-performance record among major airlines.

So far, it's working: US Airways went from worst among the seven largest U.S. carriers in on-time performance in the first six months of last year to best this year, federal data show.

Isom hired Bob Ciminelli, who had run American's operations at New York's LaGuardia Airport, to be US Airways' vice president of operations at Philadelphia International. He is responsible for getting 23,000 bags on and off planes each day and making sure the 451 departures leave on time from 87 gates.

Gentle-mannered and quiet-spoken, Ciminelli is employing strategies that worked at LaGuardia.

"I don't profess to be a miracle worker, but I hold people accountable," Ciminelli said in his airport office. "What was lacking here was accountability, direction. People needed to know, 'Where do you want us to go?' They needed someone to lead the way."

To reduce the international-baggage backlog, US Airways asked British Airways to swap ticket counters, which gave US Airways more behind-the-scenes bag-recheck capability. British Airways has two daily international flights; US Airways has 34.

US Airways worked with the airport to build a new baggage-screening area in the international terminal, with four additional screening machines for rechecking bags. More than half of US Airways' returning international passengers recheck bags to connecting flights.

US Airways in the fall will build a $6.5 million conveyor-belt "bridge" from International Arrivals in Terminal A-West to the new bag-screening machines in Terminal A-East.

One of Ciminelli's first moves was to change baggage handling so that suitcases for connecting flights are transferred by runners directly, instead of being mixed with local bags and cargo.

The runners' only job is to meet flights and take bags to connecting planes. A separate team of ground workers takes local bags, cargo and mail.

In addition, 30 ramp-information display screens have been installed at a cost of $2.2 million at gates outside Terminals B and C for baggage handlers and ramp workers to have more accurate information about an airplane's destination and departure time. The electronic display boards have countdown clocks so ground workers know how much time they have to load a flight.

Ciminelli said those two things - changing how handlers move luggage and installing ramp information - were the "main reason" for reduced domestic-luggage complaints.

It probably didn't hurt that the airline also began rewarding employees with cash when it gets good performance marks or even customer praise.

Ciminelli and another recent hire in Philadelphia, senior vice president Suzanne Boda, have latitude to make financial, hiring and operational decisions without getting prior approval from headquarters in Tempe, Ariz. Boda oversees international, cargo and East Coast operations.

After he took office in January, Mayor Nutter told top US Airways officials he wanted to see improvement in the airline's performance and, in particular, a better summer operation "because that's when we have had service problems in the past," Isdell said.

Since that meeting, Ciminelli and his team have met every Friday with city aviation officials and Transportation Security Administration, Homeland Security, and Customs and Border Protection representatives to talk about summer plans.

"We've been able to work through a lot of issues," Ciminelli said.

His strategy for getting planes out on time is to focus on the "first bank" of 20 to 25 morning flights between 6 and 9 a.m. The premise: If the first flights depart on time, the rest should fall in place.

At noon Monday to Friday, he meets with his directors, aircraft-maintenance personnel, and representatives of the flight attendants, pilots, vendors, and people who fuel and clean the aircraft - "anyone who could impact our departure," Ciminelli said.

"We review any delay. We tear it apart - what happened," Ciminelli said. "I'm not there to beat anybody up. The intent is to understand what happened, and what we could have done to avoid or minimize it."

He credits the noon meetings with a "dramatic improvement" in on-time departures of morning flights. The group also talks about the prior day's international flights. On Mondays, they talk about the Saturday and Sunday flights.

US Airways' managers spot-check baggage arrivals, do safety and performance checks of ground workers on the ramp, and monitor the 20 to 25 early-morning flights.

"If the manager's flight incurs a delay, he or she is asked to come to the noon meeting to share what happened," Ciminelli said. "A little accountability and direction, you put all that into the formula. It's working."

US Airways added 200 baggage handlers last year, raising the total to 1,250. It tripled the number of managers overseeing airport service from 30 to 90.

The airline bought new ground service equipment - tractors, tugs and carts. There's new sorting equipment for bags that are checked at ticket counters, and new software that reads bar codes on baggage tags so they are dumped on a conveyor belt to the proper flights.

In the fall, the airline also began offering financial incentives to employees. US Airways gives $50 to each of its 35,600 employees every month the airline finishes in the top three among the largest airlines in on-time performance, baggage handling or customer complaints, based on Department of Transportation data.

The airline also rewards employees who get compliments from customers or managers, and holds drawings each quarter to give away $265,000 in cash, including ten $10,000 checks and other $1,000 and $250 awards.

"We have come a long way, but we still have a long way to go," said Ciminelli, noting that while Philadelphia had 17 mishandled bags in July per 1,000 passengers, LaGuardia and Phoenix had six bag complaints each.

Indeed, there are still bag snafus. Jackie Baldwin of Villas, N.J., flew on US Airways to Washington's Reagan National Airport last Sunday. Her checked bag never made it.

"I still have no idea where my bag is," she said Tuesday, upon returning to Philadelphia with a borrowed suitcase. "It's funny now, but it wasn't at the time." Baldwin planned to file a lost-bag claim with customer services.


CLT keeping most flights

US AIRWAYS CEO: With a strong base of business travelers, the city's hub has the ‘ability to cover the cost of fuel.'

By Jefferson George
Charlotte Observer


 
Aug. 01, 2008

Thanks to a big chunk of business travelers and a smooth-running hub airport, Charlotte will see only a few flight cuts this fall as US Airways slashes service nationwide to offset high fuel costs, the airline's top executive said Thursday.

“Charlotte has been one of the real jewels of the US Airways system,” said Doug Parker, the company's chairman and chief executive, during a meeting with editors at the Observer. “In good times, we do well. In bad times like this, we do less badly than other places.”

Surging oil prices this year have forced smaller airlines to file for bankruptcy and larger ones to reinvent themselves.

Along with cutting flights and amenities, airlines are charging fees for services that used to be free. For instance, after eliminating free pretzels and pay movies on planes in recent weeks, US Airways will start charging for soft drinks and coffee today.

While Charlotte travelers will pay the same fees as anyone else, the lack of flight cuts could ease concerns in a region where US Airways dominates traffic, with nearly 90 percent of passenger flights at Charlotte/Douglas International Airport. Of the airport's roughly 670 daily departures, US Airways has more than 580, and local business leaders often tout the hub as key to attracting and retaining companies.

Nationwide, US Airways plans to reduce seats for sale by about 8percent this fall and make similar cuts in 2009.

The biggest cuts will come in markets with heavy leisure traffic and typically lower fares, such as Phoenix and Las Vegas. The latter is expected to lose a fourth of its flights.

“Our Charlotte hub doesn't have that type of customer,” Parker said. “It's a much stronger type of customer in terms of business traffic. … You have more ability to cover the cost of fuel.”

So far this year, he said, the only routes dropped were recent additions with little business, such as Sacramento, Calif., and Panama City, Fla. The airline says it plans to cut